The Kansas Reflector welcomes opinion items from writers who share our purpose of widening the dialog about how public insurance policies have an effect on the day-to-day lives of individuals all through our state. Sh
Two choices issued by the U.S. Supreme Courtroom final month — one overturning Roe v. Wade and the opposite permitting for non secular prayer at public faculty sporting occasions — sign an alarming shift towards permitting private non secular beliefs to dominate public coverage.
After studying the choices in Dobbs v. Jackson Ladies’s Well being Group and Kennedy v. Bremerton College District, the message from the Supreme Courtroom was clear: Anybody who believes in non secular liberty must be alarmed.
The talk about non secular liberty and abortion entry will collide this summer time when Kansas turns into the primary state to vote on the appropriate to abortion well being care in a post-Roe world.
As a civil rights legal professional, I imagine deeply in the appropriate of individuals to apply their faith. However I imagine simply as deeply in the appropriate of individuals to dwell free from any authorities entanglement with faith.
I’m additionally Jewish. Because of this when the federal government makes use of faith (on this case, a slim, extraordinarily conservative Christian worldview) to justify coverage, it doesn’t all the time line up with the faith I and thousands and thousands of others apply. That is all of the extra cause to maintain faith utterly out of presidency: Faith is complicated and nuanced, and permitting it to animate legal guidelines — notably legal guidelines that infringe on individuals’s rights — dangers the unintended oppression of non-dominant religions.
Dobbs and Kennedy had been issued again to again, and though they cope with completely different areas of the regulation, when learn collectively their message is obvious. Spiritual freedom for non-Christian individuals hangs within the stability.
Let’s begin with Dobbs. By overturning 50-year-old precedent, the Supreme Courtroom granted license to conservative state legislatures to pursue abortion bans in all circumstances. Anti-choice advocates typically have used faith as a justification for enacting restrictive measures that take away well being care decision-making authority from pregnant individuals. Dobbs opened the floodgates for such legal guidelines.
Then got here Kennedy, by which the court docket held that the coach of a public highschool soccer group could lead on his group in Christian prayer on the sector on the finish of video games. The court docket didn’t concern itself with the discomfort non-Christian athletes may really feel, or the sign such prayer would ship concerning the faculty district’s endorsement or favoritism of 1 faith over one other. In doing so, as Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissent, the court docket set our nation on “a deadly path” towards entangling states with faith, which, “Is not any victory for non secular liberty.”
Most voters wouldn’t need faculty districts pressuring their youngsters to hope with a coach who practiced a faith completely different from their very own on the finish of a soccer recreation. And most voters wouldn’t need lawmakers to intrude with their private well being care choices, notably when these choices are animated by the lawmakers’ non secular religion.
However the sign from the court docket on the finish of this yr’s time period was that each of this stuff are completely fantastic.
On Aug. 2, Kansas voters will resolve on a constitutional modification that will essentially alter our constitutional panorama and, within the wake of Dobbs, doubtlessly result in laws subsequent session outlawing abortion in all circumstances. These legal guidelines would apply to all Kansans, no matter their non secular beliefs.
My religion — Judaism — doesn’t align with the non secular proper’s view on abortion. Jewish teachings, together with from the Talmud (a key textual content in deciphering Jewish regulation), and the Mishnah (a e-book of Jewish authorized principle) clearly point out that abortion is permitted — certainly, required — when the lifetime of the mom is in danger.
My religion — Judaism — doesn’t align with the non secular proper’s view on abortion. Jewish teachings, together with from the Talmud (a key textual content in deciphering Jewish regulation), and the Mishnah (a e-book of Jewish authorized principle) clearly point out that abortion is permitted — certainly, required — when the lifetime of the mom is in danger.
Even the Orthodox Union, representing a decidedly extra conservative department of the Jewish religion, put out a press release in Might that “Jewish regulation prioritizes the lifetime of the pregnant mom over the lifetime of the fetus such that the place the being pregnant critically endangers the bodily well being or psychological well being of the mom, an abortion could also be licensed, if not mandated, by halacha (Jewish regulation) and must be obtainable to all ladies regardless of their financial standing.”
In my faith, personhood belongs to the particular person bearing the kid, at first; and solely after that’s safe do rights convey to the fetus. However abortion legal guidelines which have begun passing in states like Oklahoma and Texas — and which might undoubtedly come to Kansas, if the constitutional modification passes — run opposite to this perception.
So the choice in Dobbs, though not explicitly about freedom of faith, serves to foreclose my potential to make well being care choices in a approach that’s in line with non secular liberty. In that approach, overturning Roe units us down the identical perilous path in the direction of dismantling the separation of church and state because the court docket’s resolution in Kennedy.
As a civil rights lawyer; as a Jewish girl; and maybe most significantly, because the mom of two younger youngsters who I hope to lift in a state (and a world) the place their non secular rights are as revered as a lot as anybody else’s, I notice how a lot is at stake Aug. 2.
By way of its opinion part, the Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who find themselves affected by public insurance policies or excluded from public debate. Discover data, together with the right way to submit your individual commentary, right here.
